Bhagavad Gita 18.31

Moksha Sanyasa Yoga · English Translation

Bhagavad Gita 18.31 — "That, by which one wrongly understands Dharma and Adharma and also what ought to be done and what ou"
Bhagavad Gita 18.31 — Moksha Sanyasa Yoga
Sanskrit

यया धर्ममधर्मं च कार्यं चाकार्यमेव च | अयथावत्प्रजानाति बुद्धिः सा पार्थ राजसी ||१८-३१||

Transliteration

yayā dharmamadharmaṃ ca kāryaṃ cākāryameva ca . ayathāvatprajānāti buddhiḥ sā pārtha rājasī ||18-31||

What Does This Verse Mean?

In this verse, Lord Krishna explains to Arjuna that the intellect is considered Rajasic when it cannot correctly distinguish between what is right (Dharma) and wrong (Adharma). This confused state of mind leads a person to mistake harmful actions for good ones, or vice versa. The key teaching here is that true wisdom requires a clear understanding of duty versus non-duty, free from the distortion of passion and ego.

The Teaching Behind It

This verse is central to Jnana Yoga (the path of knowledge) and the study of Buddhi Tattva, as it defines how spiritual wisdom or lack thereof determines one's quality of action. It elaborates on the Sankhya concept that human experience is governed by the three Gunas (qualities), specifically highlighting how Rajoguna distorts judgment and hinders liberation.

Word by Word
यया by which, धर्मम् Dharma, अधर्मम् Adharma, च and, कार्यम् what ought to be done, च and, अकार्यम् what ought not to be done, एव even, च and, अयथावत् wrongly, प्रजानाति understands, बुद्धिः intellect, सा that, पार्थ O Partha, राजसी Rajasic (passionate)
Classical Commentary
There is no proper eivalent in the English language for the word Dharma. Duty, righteousness, virtue, law are very poor translations of the word. That which elevates you and takes you to the goal, i.e.? Brahman or the Self, is Dharma. That which hurls you down into the dark abyss of ignorance is Adharma. What is ordained in the scriptures is Dharma what is prohibited by them is Adharma. A Rajasic intellect is not able to distinguish between right and wrong or to understand the difference between righteous and unrighteous actions. Ayathavat Wrongly Contrary to what is determined by all authorities or men of wisdom or to the highest knowledge.

Where This Happens

This verse appears in the final chapter of the Bhagavad Gita as Lord Krishna concludes his detailed classification of three types of intellects (Sattvic, Rajasic, and Tamasic) during the pre-battle counseling on Kurukshetra. He has just finished describing how a passionate mind is clouded by greed and ego, leading to confusion about duty. Arjuna, who was previously paralyzed by grief and moral doubt, listens intently as Krishna helps him diagnose why his own hesitation might stem from an unbalanced state of mind.

Living It Out Today

Consider a manager at work who feels pressured to cut corners on safety protocols to meet a quarterly bonus deadline; their Rajasic intellect convinces them that 'the ends justify the means' and this action is acceptable. They fail to see that violating ethical standards (Adharma) will eventually destroy the company's reputation, mistaking short-term gain for long-term success. A Sattvic approach here would require setting aside personal ambition to do exactly what ought to be done: adhering strictly to safety rules regardless of pressure.

Explained for Children

Imagine you have a flashlight in your hands, but someone has covered it with red plastic so everything looks orange instead of white. That's what happens to our 'inner compass' when we are too emotional or selfish; we can't see clearly which path is safe (good) and which one leads into danger (bad). Krishna tells us that a Rajasic mind is like that broken flashlight, making us think it's okay to do something wrong because we just really want to.

Daily Reflection

You often find yourself making choices driven by the urge to win or avoid discomfort rather than what is truly right for you. This verse gently reminds us that when our intellect is clouded by Rajas (passion), we confuse duty with desire and mistake impulse for truth. Today, pause before your next big decision to ask if your mind is seeking a reward or simply doing its sacred work without attachment.

A Practice for Today

Sit quietly and observe the voice of your intellect as it categorizes right from wrong today, noting if fear or desire is distorting your judgment. Ask yourself: Is this decision based on a clear understanding of duty, or am I confusing passion with righteousness? Rest in that clarity, letting go of labels imposed by agitation.

Key Teachings

  1. The Fog of Passion
    Rajasic intellect operates like a lens distorted by heat and agitation, causing one to perceive duty as something that brings personal gain rather than spiritual order.
  2. Confusion of Duty
    When the mind is dominated by passion, it fails to distinguish between actions that align with cosmic law (Dharma) and those driven solely by selfish cravings (Adharma).

Themes

Intelligence and WisdomDharma vs AdharmaRajoguna (Passion)Ethical Decision MakingMental ClaritySpiritual Progress

Related Verses

2.473.3018.666.518.29

Read This Next

  1. 2.47 — Read this next to learn the antidote: performing action without attachment, which stabilizes a Rajasic intellect.
  2. 3.30 — This verse complements 18.31 by offering the practice of surrendering all actions to the Divine as a way to purify one's vision.
  3. 12.15 — Read this to understand how those who transcend such confusion become dear to Krishna and attain lasting peace.

Recommended Reading

GitaQ earns from qualifying purchases as an Amazon Associate.

Share This Verse

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Krishna call this intellect 'Rajasic'?
It is called Rajasic because it is driven by passion, desire, and ego, which cloud judgment. A passionate mind seeks personal gratification over universal truth, causing the individual to confuse what should be done with what they want to do.
How can one recognize if their intellect has become Rajasic?
You might notice that you consistently justify harmful actions or ignore ethical boundaries in favor of short-term gains. This state often brings a sense of urgency and agitation rather than calm clarity when making difficult decisions.
Is it possible to move from Rajasic confusion to Sattvic wisdom?
This verse highlights that having knowledge alone isn't enough if one's understanding of right and wrong is distorted by passion. True wisdom involves not just intellectual agreement but a deep, clear realization that aligns action with moral duty without internal conflict.
In Other Languages: Bhagavad Gita 18.31 →